疫情期间骨科与急诊外科共管模式治疗老年髋部骨折的实践探索
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

广东药科大学附属第一医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

广东省医学科研基金项目(编号:B2019184); 广东省中医药局项目(编号:20191204)


Practical exploration of orthopaedic and emergency surgery co-management mode in the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly during the epidemic period
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Orthopaedics, first affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间老年髋部骨折的诊治管理,并评估我院实施骨科与急诊外科共管模式治疗老年髋部骨折后的效果。[方法]从2020年1月开始,我院采用骨科与急诊外科共管模式对老年(≥60岁)髋部骨折进行统一规范管理,并优化其诊治流程。本研究回顾性分析自2020年1月至2020年2月,采用共管模式治疗老年髋部骨折患者31例。与共管模式实施之前的数据进行比较,即分为共管模式组及共管模式前组。从一般资料、手术相关指标、围手术期并发症3个方面对两组进行比较分析。[结果]疫情期间,没有出现发热患者的漏诊、误诊;全科医护人员未出现院内交叉感染。两组患者均顺利手术,共管模式组患者行PFNA手术的切口长度优于共管模式前组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者在一般资料的对比、其余手术相关指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。并发症方面,共管模式组的肺部感染发生率高于共管模式前组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而在其它围手术期并发症发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]新冠肺炎疫情下,通过骨科与急诊外科共管模式、多学科协作等应对策略,保证各项防控措施落实到位、有效避免交叉感染的同时,可以缩短老年髋部骨折的术前等待时间,提高治疗效率。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To explore the diagnosis, treatment and management of senile hip fracture during COVID-19 epidemic situation, and to evaluate the effect of the co-management mode of orthopedics and emergency surgery in the treatment of senile hip fracture in our hospital. [Methods] Since January 2020, our hospital has adopted the co-management mode of orthopedics and emergency surgery to unify and standardize the management of hip fractures in the elderly (≥ 60 years old), and optimize the process of diagnosis and treatment. From January 2020 to February 2020, 31 elderly patients with hip fracture were treated with co-management mode. Compared with the data before the implementation of co-management mode, it is divided into co-management mode group and pre-co-management mode group. The two groups were compared and analyzed from three aspects: general data, operation-related indexes and perioperative complications. [Results] During the epidemic period, there was no missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of febrile patients, and there was no hospital cross infection among general doctors and nurses. The incision length of PFNA operation in the co-management mode group was better than that in the former group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in general data and other operation-related indexes between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of complications, the incidence of pulmonary infection in the co-management mode group was significantly higher than that in the pre-co-management mode group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of other perioperative complications (P > 0.05). [Conclusion] Under the epidemic situation of COVID-19, through the co-management mode of orthopaedics and emergency surgery, multi-disciplinary cooperation and other coping strategies to ensure that various prevention and control measures are in place and effectively avoid cross-infection, it can shorten the preoperative waiting time of hip fracture in the elderly and improve the efficiency of treatment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-10
  • 录用日期:2020-04-23
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: