单纯前外侧腰椎间融合术治疗轻度单节段退变性腰椎滑脱症的安全性及腰椎影像学参数改善效果
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.庆阳市人民医院;2.甘肃省庆阳市西峰区人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The safety and improvement of lumbar imaging parameters of anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of mild degree single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Qingyang People'2.'3.s Hospital;4.Xifeng District People'5.s Hospital, Qingyang City, Gansu Province

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 探讨单纯前外侧腰椎间融合术(ALLIF)治疗轻度单节段退变性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)的安全性及腰椎影像学参数变化。[方法] 收集轻度(Ⅰ或Ⅱ度)单节段DLS患者115例,根据术式分为ALLIF组(n=54)和后路经椎间孔腰椎间融合术组(TLIF组,n=61)。比较两组围手术期情况,评价腰腿痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分,影像学评价椎间隙高度(DH)、融合节段前凸角(SL)、腰椎滑脱比(SP)。[结果] ALLIF组的术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量、下地活动时间及住院时间均低于TLIF组(P<0.05)。术后1周、3个月、6个月、12个月,两组的腰痛/腿痛VAS评分及ODI评分均较术前降低(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1周、3个月、6个月、12个月,两组DH 、SL均较术前升高,且ALLIF组高于TLIF组(P<0.05),两组SP均降低(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] ALLIF治疗轻度单节段DLS可获得良好疗效,且较TLIF具有创伤小、术后恢复快等优点,在恢复腰椎前凸角及椎间隙高度方面可能更具优势。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To investigate the safety of simple anterior-lateral lumbar interbody fusion (ALLIF) for the treatment of mild degree single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and influence on the lumbar imaging parameters. [Methods] A total of 115 patients with mild (Ⅰ or Ⅱ degree) single-segment DLS who underwent surgical treatment were divided into ALLIF group (n=54) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group (TLIF group, n=61). The perioperative situation of the two groups were compared, the visual analog scale (VAS) score of lumbar and leg pain and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were evaluated, the disc height (DH), segmental lordotic angle (SL), SP percentage % (SP) were measured by imaging. [Results] The intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative drainage volume, activity time, hospital stay in the ALLIF group were lower than those in the TLIF group (P<0.05). At 1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery, the back pain/leg pain VAS score and ODI score of the two groups were lower than before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). At 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, the DH and SL in the two groups were higher than before surgery, and the ALLIF group were higher than the TLIF group (P<0.05), the SP in both groups was reduced (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). [Conclusion] ALLIF is safe and effective in the treatment of mild single-segment DLS, and has the advantages of less trauma and faster postoperative recovery than TLIF. It may be more advantageous in recovering lumbar lordosis and intervertebral space.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-02
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-23
  • 录用日期:2020-04-13
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: