可视环锯在经皮内镜椎间孔入路手术中的有效性安全性探讨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

四川省骨科医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VISUALIZED TREPHINE IN PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN APPROACH
Author:
Affiliation:

Sichuan Orthopedic Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的] 探讨可视环锯在经皮内镜椎间孔入路手术中的有效性、安全性。[方法] 2017年5月至2018年6月共58例患接受经皮脊柱内镜手术,分成:可视环锯组和TESSYS 组,各29例。可视环锯组穿刺到上关节突外侧并建立工作通道,可视下关节突成形。TESSYS组按照经典TESSYS操作步骤进行。统计两组年龄、性别、透视次数、关节突成形时间及并发症,以及下肢VAS评分、MacNab评分等评价临床疗效。[结果] 所有患者均完成手术,无中途改为开放手术。两组术后下肢VAS、ODI及JOA评分均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);各时间点两组之间评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。依据MacNab疗效标准,可视环锯组和TESSYS组优良率分别为89.66%、86.21%,两组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。可视环锯组关节突成形时间 (12.33±9.86)min,透视次数(4.52±2.64)次,TESSYS组关节突成形时间(20.54±10.46)min,透视次数(15.26 ±4.51)次;两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TESSYS组14例行术中二次关节突成形,1例出口根损伤,3例行走根外膜损伤,1例出现有症状的关节突骨块残留。两组无出血、感染、腹腔损伤等并发症。[结论] 可视环锯在经皮内镜椎间孔入路手术中应用,具有穿刺简单、放射暴露少,关节突成形准确,手术疗效可靠等优点,是一项有效安全的技术。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of visualized trephine in percutaneous endoscopic intervertebral foramen approach. [Methods] From May 2017 to June 2018, 58 patients were divided equally into two groups,visualized triphe group and TESSYS group , and underwent percutaneous endoscopic discectomy through intervertebral foramen approach. In visualized triphe group was punctured to the outside of the upper articular process and established a working channel, and articular process was visually formed. TESSYS group followed the classic TESSYS procedure. Age, gender, number of fluoroscopy, foraminoplasty time and complications of the two groups were counted, and the visual analogue scale (VAS), and MacNab standard were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy before, after and at the last follow-up. [Results] All patients completed the operation, and none changed to open surgery. There was no significant difference in gender and age between the two groups (P>0.05). VAS score, ODI and JOA score were compared before, after operation and at the post-operation 12 month follow-up between the two groups, there were significantly improvements in all the three kind of scores after surgery with statistical difference (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). MacNab criteria, Visualized triphe group and TESSYS group were 89.66%、86.21% respectively , comparing the two groups have no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Time of foraminoplasty and number of fluoroscopy are 12.33±9.86minutes , 4.52±2.64 times, respectively, in visualized triphe group. In TESSYS group are 20.54±10.46 minutes and 15.26 ±4.51 times. Compared with the two groups, the difference of foraminoplasty time and number of fluoroscopy were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no complications such as bleeding and infection in the two groups. In TESSYS group, there were five cases of second foraminoplasty, one case of injury of exit never root, three cases of ambulatory root membrane injury, no neurological complications and one had symptomatic facet bone residue and was treated with open surgery. [Conclusion] Compared with the classic TESSYS technique, the application of visualized trephine has the advantages of simple puncture, less radiation exposure, surgical effect reliable. Visualized trephine is an effective and safe technology.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-24
  • 最后修改日期:2020-06-16
  • 录用日期:2020-06-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: