机器人辅助与透视辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折置钉准确性及透视剂量的对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川省医学科学院·2.四川省人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省科技厅科技支撑项目(2019YFS0268)


Compare the pedicle screw placement accuracy and the fluoroscopic dose of robotic-guided and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Sichuan Academy of medical science,People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province,

Fund Project:

Science and Technology Support Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2019YFS0268)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]比较机器人辅助与透视辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的置钉准确性及透视剂量。[方法]回顾分析2018年1月-12月收治的86例无神经损伤症状胸腰椎骨折患者临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为机器人辅助组和透视组。比较两组临床结果及影像学指标。[结果]机器人组手术时间明显少于透视组(P<0.001)。两组患者术中失血量和住院时间差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组切口长度长于透视组(P<0.001)。两组VAS评分和早期并发症发生率无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。机器人组透视次数、透视剂量、透视时间均明显小于透视组(P<0.001)。机器人组和透视组置钉准确率分别为95.6%(241/252)和87.8%(232/264),两组置钉情况差异具有统计学意义(χ2=17.001,P=0.001)。机器人组置钉的内倾角明显大于透视组(P<0.001),机器人辅助组螺钉与关节面的距离明显大于透视组(P<0.001)。[结论]机器人辅助治疗胸腰椎骨折可提高置钉准确性,减少透视次数,减少透视时间,降低辐射量,提高手术安全性,具有良好的应用前景。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]To compare the pedicle screw placement accuracy and the fluoroscopic dose of robotic-guided and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures[Methods]The medical records of 86 patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological injury admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, which were divided into robotic-guided group and fluoroscopy-guided group.The clinical outcome and radiographic index were compared between two groups.[Results]The operation time of robotic-guided group was significantly lesser than fluoroscopy-guided group(P<0.001). The intraoperative hemorrhage and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups(P>0.05).The incision length was significantly longer than fluoroscopy-guided group(P<0.001).The VAS scores and the incidence of early complications showed no significant difference between groups(P>0.05).The fluoroscopic frequency,fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopy dose of the robot-guided group were significantly lesser than fluoroscopy-guided group(P<0.001).The accuracy of pedicle screws was 95.6% (241/252) and 87.8% (232/264) respectively.The situation of implanting pedicle screw showed significant difference between the two groups (χ2=17.001,P=0.001).The convergence angle of the robot-guided group was significantly greater than fluoroscopy-guided group(P<0.001), and the distance between the screw and the articular surface of the robot-guided group was significantly longer than that of the fluoroscopy-guided group(P<0.001)[Conclusion]Robot-guided percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures could improve the accuracy of implant,reduce fluoroscopic frequency,reduce operation time,reduce fluoroscopic dose and improve safety of operation,which had a great prospect to be applied.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-03
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-28
  • 录用日期:2020-04-01
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: