经皮微创椎弓根钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

北华大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative analysis of the efficacy of percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw system in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]通过大量临床病例统计分析,分析经皮椎弓根钉系统治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效以及治疗的优缺点。[方法]将2014年6月~2018 年8月期间在本院及协作医院手术治疗的588例胸腰椎骨折患者作为临床研究对象,手术方式随机分组,实验组300例,男174例,女126例,年龄(40.31±10.99)岁,采用经皮椎弓根螺钉系统复位固定。对照组288例,男168例,女120例,年龄(39.71±11.02)岁,采用传统开放式椎弓根螺钉内固定。观察各组手术时间,术中出血量,切口长度,住院时间,VAS疼痛分级,椎体高度恢复, Cobb 角矫正及随访时治疗效果进行对比分析。[结果]微创组的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间(61.28±6.28min,64.90±3.14ml,7.98±0.56cm,10.59±1.23d)均少于开放组(74.95±3.11min,395.11±57.06ml,13.49±0.89cm,13.05±1.49d);两组椎体高度均得到恢复(术前实验组52.79±4.33,对照组52.86±4.20;术后实验组85.41±3.98,对照组85.95±3.64),术后Cobb 角(实验组3.91±3.44、对照组4.02±3.38)较治疗前(实验组17.38±3.97、对照组17.59±3.72)均显著缩小,晚期椎体高度矫正度丢失(实验组2.17±1.15,对照组2.06±0.89)差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);经皮微创组并发症发生率1.00%低于开放组的1.39%,术后疼痛两组无差异,但后期随访时、实验组2.05±0.82较对照组2.35.49±0.64低(p<0.05)。[结论]采取经皮微创椎弓根钉系统内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果显著,多项指标明显优于开放组,可缩短手术时间、减少出血量,降低并发症发生率,安全有效,值得临床推广,但是存在手术操作技术难度大、学习曲线长的缺点。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Through statistical analysis of a large number of clinical cases, advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous pedicle screw system in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures were evaluated.[Methods]During June 2014 and August 2018 in our hospital and cooperation hospital surgical treatment of 588 patients with thoracolumbar fractures as research object, the operation method of random group, experimental group 300 cases, 174 cases of male, female 126, age (40.31±10.99), the soft channel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation system restoration, control group 288 cases, 168 cases of male, female 120 cases, age (39.71 ±11.02), the traditional open pedicle screw internal fixation. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, length of time in hospital, VAS pain grade, vertebral height recovery, Cobb Angle correction and follow-up were compared and analyzed.[Results] the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay (61.28±6.28min, 64.90±3.14ml, 7.98±0.56cm, 10.59±1.23d) of the minimally invasive soft-channel group were all lower than those of the open group (74.95±3.11min, 395.11±57.06ml, 13.49±0.89cm, 13.05±1.49d). Vertebral height was restored in both groups (52.79±4.33 in the experimental group and 52.86±4.20 in the control group). After operation, the Cobb Angle (3.91±3.44 in the experimental group and 4.02±3.38 in the control group) was significantly reduced compared with that before treatment (17.38±3.97 in the experimental group and 17.59±3.72 in the control group). There was no statistically significant difference in the loss of height correction of the late vertebral body (2.17±1.15 in the experimental group and 2.06±0.89 in the control group) (p>0.05). The incidence of complications in the percutaneous minimally invasive group was 1.00% lower than that in the open group (1.39%), and there was no difference in postoperative pain between the two groups. However, during follow-up, the rate of complications in the experimental group was 2.05±0.82 lower than that in the control group (2.35.49±0.64) (p<0.05). [Conclusion] take the percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw system internal fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, a number of indicators is better than the open group, can shorten the operation time, less blood loss, reduce the incidence of complications, safe and effective, worthy of clinical promotion, but technology more difficult,and longer learning process.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-30
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-30
  • 录用日期:2019-12-25
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: