老年股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA失败的危险因素分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

石河子大学医学院第一附属医院骨科中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

TGFβ1介导软骨下骨骨重塑在OA病变中的机制与作用研究,国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Analysis of risk factors for failure of PFNA in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

Orthopedic Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College,Shihezi University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]:探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折术后发生内固定失败的相关危险因素。[方法]:回顾性分析自2013年1月~2017年6月本院采用 PFNA 内固定治疗的240例股骨粗隆间骨折的临床资料。建立 Logistic 回归模型,分析易导致内固定失败的危险因素。[结果]:240例患者失访56例,其余184例患者均获得24个月的随访。184例中患者32例出现内固定失败,11例髋内翻,7例退钉,9例内固定切割,5例骨折不愈合。其余152例成功患者术后24个月髋关节Harris功能评分:优20例,良78例,中50例,差4例,优良率64.47%。而32例失败患者发生内固定失败后3个月Harris功能评分:优0例,良4例,中5例,差23例。优良率为12.5%。单因素分析显示:外侧壁厚度、尖顶距(TAD)、正位对位差、外侧壁分型、Singh指数和骨折分型与内固定失败相关(P<0.05),而性别、年龄、侧位对位差、螺旋刀片区域与内固定失败无关(P>0.05)。 Logistic 回归分析提示:TAD、外侧壁厚度、Singh指数和骨折分型、是内固定失败的危险因素(P<0.05)。[结论]:TAD、骨质疏松程度、外侧壁厚度及骨折稳定性是内固定失败的危险因素,且内固定的失败将严重影响患者髋关节功能。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To investigate the risk factors associated with postoperative internal fixation failure in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail fixation (PFNA). [Methods]: The clinical data of 240 cases of intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA internal fixation from January 2013 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A Logistic regression model was established to analyze risk factors that could lead to internal fixation failure. [Results]: 240 patients were lost to follow-up in 56 cases, and the remaining 184 patients were followed up for 24 months. Of the 184 patients, 32 had internal fixation failure, 11 had hip varus, 7 had retraction, 9 had internal fixation, and 5 had nonunion. The remaining 152 successful patients had a Harris function score of 24 months after operation: excellent in 20 cases, good in 78 cases, moderate in 50 cases, and poor in 4 cases. The excellent and good rate was 64.47%. In the 32 patients with failure, the Harris function scores were 3 months after the internal fixation failure: excellent in 0, good in 4, fair in 5, and poor in 23. The excellent and good rate was 12.5%. Univariate analysis showed that the thickness of the lateral wall, the tip margin (TAD), the orthotopic difference, the lateral wall classification, the Singh index, and the fracture classification were associated with internal fixation failure (P<0.05), while gender, age, and lateral position. The position difference and spiral blade area were not related to the internal fixation failure (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis suggested that TAD, lateral wall thickness, Singh index and fracture classification were risk factors for internal fixation failure (P<0.05). [Conclusion]: TAD, osteoporosis degree, lateral wall thickness and fracture stability are risk factors for internal fixation failure, and the failure of internal fixation will seriously affect the hip function of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-09
  • 最后修改日期:2019-11-08
  • 录用日期:2019-11-18
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: