不同踝关节外侧韧带解剖重建术式对踝关节稳定状态的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

达州市中心医院普外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

2014年四川省高职院校省级重点专业建设项目(序号19); 四川省教育厅项目(14ZA0031); 四川省教育厅项目(16ZA0396); 四川省科技计划项目(16ZA0395)


The influence of different anatomical reconstruction methods of lateral ankle ligament on ankle joint stability
Author:
Affiliation:

General Surgery Department,Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou Sichuan 635000

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 通过有限元分析的方法研究不同踝关节外侧韧带解剖重建术式对踝关节稳定状态的影响。方法 选取1例32岁健康男性志愿者的踝关节三维CT数据,构建骨骼的实体模型。设计正常对照模型、单韧带重建模型、Y形重建模型、双隧道重建模型。网格划分、定义材料力学属性及接触关系。在踝关节中立位、跖屈20°、背伸10°三种状态添加150N牵引力模拟前抽屉试验, 1.7N?m内旋扭矩模拟跟骨内翻试验。结果 ①前抽屉载荷,中立位和跖屈20°位距腓前韧带的Von Mises应力,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),背伸10°位单韧带重建模型和双隧道重建模型的Von Mises应力显著小于对照模型和Y形重建模型,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②内翻载荷下,跟腓韧带的Von Mises应力双隧道重建模型、Y形重建模型和对照模型之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。背伸10°位,Y形重建模型和对照模型之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均大于双隧道模型(P<0.05)。③内翻载荷下,中立位、跖屈20°位、背伸10°位单韧带重建模型的距骨倾斜度均大于其他三个模型(P<0.01)。结论 双隧道和Y形重建踝关节外侧复合体的稳定性优于单纯重建距腓前韧带,而Y形重建作为一种功能解剖重建优于双隧道重建。

    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective To study the effect of different anatomical reconstruction methods of lateral ankle ligament on ankle joint stability by finite element analysis. Methods Three-dimensional CT data of ankle joint of a 32-year-old healthy male volunteer were selected to construct a solid skeleton model. Normal control model, single ligament reconstruction model, Y-shaped reconstruction model and double tunnel reconstruction model were designed. Mesh and define mechanical properties and contact relationship of materials. Ankle neutral position, plantar flexion 20 and dorsal extension 10 were added 150N to simulate the anterior drawer test and 1.7N ·m internal rotation torque to simulate calcaneal varus test. Results (1) The Von Mises stress of anterior drawer load, neutral position and 20° metatarsal flexion from anterior fibular ligament was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The Von Mises stress of single ligament reconstruction model and double tunnel reconstruction model at 10° dorsiflexion was significantly less than that of control model and y-shape reconstruction model (P<0.05). (2) Under inverted load,There was no significant difference between Von Mises stress double tunnel reconstruction model, Y-shaped reconstruction model and control model (P > 0.05).There was no significant difference between the Y-shaped reconstruction model and the control model (P > 0.05) at 10 degrees of back extension, which was larger than that of the double tunnel model (P < 0.05). (3) the talus inclination of the single ligament reconstruction models at neutral position, 20 plantar flexion and 10 dorsal extension was greater than that of the other three models (P < 0.01).Conclusion The stability of double tunnel and Y-shaped reconstruction of lateral ankle complex is better than that of single anterior talofibular ligament reconstruction , and Y-shaped reconstruction is better than double tunnel reconstruction as a functional and anatomical reconstruction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-08
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-08
  • 录用日期:2019-11-13
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: