可膨胀椎间融合器在老年严重骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合术中的应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

商丘市第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application of expandable intervertebral fusion cage in thoracolumbar fusion for elderly patients with severe osteoporosis
Author:
Affiliation:

First peoples hospital of Shangqiu The orthopaedic(Joint surgery)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的:研究可膨胀椎间融合器在老年严重骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合术中的应用效果。方法:研究对象均为我院2016年3月至2018年12月收治的确诊为严重骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折患者108例。研究组52例选择可膨胀椎间融合器,对照组56例选择传统圆柱状螺纹融合器。对两组患者采用手术一般指标、治疗前后伤口疼痛评分、治疗前后神经功能评分、治疗前后影像学指标等方面的比较,进行不同术式效果的评价。结果:(1)研究组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院时间均明显低于对照组,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)治疗前,两组患者VAS评分差异较小,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,研究组患者VAS评分明显低于对照组,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)治疗前,两组患者ODI及JOA评分差异较小,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,研究组患者ODI及JOA评分明显低于对照组,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(4)治疗前,两组患者Cobb角差异较小,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者Cobb角均明显低于治疗前,研究组患者Cobb角明显低于对照组,两组比较差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:可膨胀椎间融合器具有安全、高效、微创的优势,有利于尽可能规避手术创伤、降低主观痛觉,促进脊髓功能的恢复与影像学解剖复位,促进患者预后水平的提升与生活质量的改善。因此,可膨胀椎间融合器是老年严重骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合术理想的内固定方式。

    Abstract:

    [Abstract] Objective: To study the effect of expandable interbody fusion cage in thoracolumbar spinal fusion for elderly patients with severe osteoporosis. Methods: 108 patients with severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture were admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to December 2018. Fifty-two cases in the study group were treated with expandable interbody fusion cage, and 56 cases in the control group were treated with traditional cylindrical threaded fusion cage. Two groups of patients were compared in terms of general surgical indicators, wound pain scores before and after treatment, neurological function scores before and after treatment, and imaging indicators before and after treatment to evaluate the effect of different surgical methods. Results: (1) The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume and hospitalization time of the study group were significantly lower than those of the control group, with significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). (2) Before treatment, the difference of VAS score between the two groups was not significant (P > 0.05); after treatment, the VAS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05). (3) Before treatment, there was no significant difference in ODI and JOA scores between the two groups (P > 0.05); after treatment, ODI and JOA scores in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). (4) Before treatment, there was no significant difference in Cobb angle between the two groups (P > 0.05); after treatment, the Cobb angle of the two groups was significantly lower than that before treatment, and the Cobb angle of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group, with significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Expansible intervertebral fusion cage has the advantages of safety, high efficiency and minimally invasive. It is conducive to avoiding surgical trauma, reducing subjective pain, promoting the recovery of spinal cord function and Imaging Anatomical reduction, and promoting the improvement of prognosis and quality of life of patients. Therefore, expandable intervertebral fusion cage is an ideal internal fixation method for elderly patients with severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar fusion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-19
  • 最后修改日期:2019-09-27
  • 录用日期:2019-10-08
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: