横突间入路下胸椎椎体间融合术的实验与临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东中医药大学;2.山东中医药大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

济南市科技计划项目(编号:201401261);山东省高等学校科技计划项目(编号:J17KA242);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81473709)


Experimental and clinical study of Intertransverse thoracic interbody fusion
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;2.Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 基于动物随机对照实验及临床病例应用,研究横突间入路胸椎椎体间融合术(ITIF)的可行性、安全性与有效性。方法 将24只成年山羊(体重35.67kg±2.39kg),随机分为ITIF(横突间入路胸椎椎体间融合术)组、TTIF(经椎间孔胸椎椎体间融合术)组、ITIF加椎弓根固定组、TTIF加椎弓根固定组,每组6只。由同一位经验丰富的脊柱外科医师对实验动物行上述手术,比较四组动物手术过程所需时间、术中出血量,术后第12周拍摄X线及CT,比较术后12周植骨融合情况。对所有数据进行统计学分析;结合临床病例,验证其实用性。结果 ITIF组在手术时间、出血量方面均少于TTIF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),12周时四组动物均出现融合情况,骨性融合不完全, 骨小梁排列不够整齐,融合率虽有高低,但手术方式与融合率之间不具有显著相关性(P>0.05)。结论 横突间入路胸椎椎体间融合术(ITIF)与经椎间孔胸椎椎体间融合术(TTIF)相比,可明显减少手术时间、术中出血量,ITIF加椎弓根内固定组融合率满意,具有良好的可行性、安全性与有效性;临床合适病例采用横突间入路下胸椎椎体间融合术,可取得良好效果。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective To study the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Intertransverse thoracic interbody fusion (ITIF) via transverse approach based on a randomized controlled animal experiment and clinical case. Methods Twenty-four adult goats (body weight 35.67 kg (±2.39 kg) were randomly divided into ITIF (Intertransverse thoracic interbody fusion) group, ITIF plus pedicle fixation group, TTIF (Transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion) group, TTIF plus pedicle fixation group, with 6 goats in each group. The same experienced spine surgeon performed the above operation on the experimental animals. X-ray and CT were taken at the 12th week after the operation. The time required for the operation, the amount of bleeding during the operation and the fusion of bone grafts at the 12th week after the operation were compared between the four groups. All data were analyzed statistically;Combined with clinical cases, verify its practicality. Results The operation time and bleeding volume of ITIF group were less than TTIF, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At 12 weeks, there was fusion between the four groups, but the bone fusion was incomplete and the trabecular arrangement was not perfect. Although the fusion rate is high or low, there is no significant correlation between the surgical method and the fusion rate. Conclusion Compared with transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF), Intertransverse thoracic interbody fusion (ITIF) can significantly reduce the operation time and intraoperative bleeding. The fusion rate is also acceptable. ITIF plus pedicle fixation group has good feasibility, safety and effectiveness, and can be used in clinical practice;Good clinical results can be achieved by using the intertransverse approach and thoracic interbody fusion for clinically appropriate cases.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-19
  • 最后修改日期:2019-07-19
  • 录用日期:2019-08-23
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: