侧路椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术后6年中期疗效评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.3

基金项目:

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项( 2013CZ-7)


Mid-term Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center

Fund Project:

Central Public Welfare Research Institutes Basic Research Special Fund( 2013CZ-7)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的]通过侧路椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术后6年以上病例随访分析,探讨其中期疗效、并发症、复发率及手术对腰椎稳定性的影响。[方法]临床资料回顾性分析,2012年1月-2013年6月,共计42例,男24例,女18例,年龄平均48.5岁,腰椎间盘突出症37例,腰椎管狭窄症5例。均行俯卧位下单节段椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除手术治疗。术前、术后6个月和末次随访应用直腿抬高试验角度、腰痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分、JOA评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、Mcnab优良率、X线手术节段椎间隙高度和动力位测量进行评价。[结果]随访平均82±5.5个月。患侧直腿抬高试验角度、腰痛VAS、腿痛VAS、腰椎JOA评分、ODI,术后6个月和末次随访分别与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.01),末次随访与术后6个月比较,ODI差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),余评价指标差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。Mcnab优良率,术后6个月83.3%,末次随访84.2%,二者差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。X线手术节段间盘高度比,随访终末与术前比较为平均84.52±5.66%,动力位测量未见腰椎不稳征象。[结论]侧路椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术后近期疗效良好,6年以上随访保持较好中期疗效,并发症发生率和复发率与开放显微椎间盘切除术相似,未显示手术对腰椎稳定性的明显影响。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective]To investigate the mid-term results of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in terms of clinical and radiographic findings and complication incidence.[Methods] Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and a total of 42 cases were followed up.From January 2012 to June 2013, there were 24 males and 18 females, aged 17-73 years, with an average age of 48.5 years, 37 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, 5 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, 21 patients with single segmental disc herniation L4-5, 11 patients with L5-S1, and 5 patients with multiple segmental disc herniation.There were 40 cases of protrusion type and 2 cases of prolapse type.There were 32 cases of paracentral type, 8 cases of central type and 2 cases of lateral type.Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and multiple segmental disc herniation underwent preoperative selective nerve root block to confirm the responsible segment.All patients underwent PELD in prone position.Postoperative rehabilitation were performed.The straight leg raising test(SLR) angle, visual analog scale(VAS) scores for the back and legs (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively), JOA score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Mcnab were evaluated at preopration, 6 months postoperatively and the final follow-up.Height of intervertebral space and dynamic position were measured with X-ray, and the final follow-up was compared with operation.[Results] The follow-up period was 72-90 months, with an average of 82±5.5 months. For SLR,VAS-B,VAS-L,JOA,ODI, the results of 6 months and final follow-up were compared with preoperation respectively,the differences were both statistically significant (p<0.01).Comparison between 6 months and the final follow-up showed statistically significant differences in ODI (p<0.05), and no statistically significant differences in the remaining evaluation indexes (p>0.05)..According to the Mcnab evaluation criteria, the excellent and good rates were 83.3% at 6 months postoperatively and 84.2% at the final follow-up, the differences were both statistically significant (p<0.01).The mean odds ratio of disc height between the final follow-up and preoperation was 84.52±5.66%, and the sign of lumbar instability was not shown in the dynamic position measurement.Postoperative infection, dural tear and nerve root injury were not found in this group of patients.The incidence of postoperative numbness in the innervation area of nerve roots was 14.3% at 6 months and 4.8% at 6.8 years after surgery.Two patients (4.8%) underwent revision within 3 months after surgery.[Conclusion] The short-term effect of PELD with lateral approach is good, and the mid-term effect remains good after more than 6 years of follow-up. The incidence of complications and recurrence are similar to that of open lumbar microdiscectomy, and no significant effect on lumbar stability is shown.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-15
  • 最后修改日期:2019-08-18
  • 录用日期:2019-09-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: