尼斯结弹性固定与螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

四川省自贡市第四人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省自贡市卫健委科研项目


Nice knot versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The 4th People'2.'3.s Hospital of Zigong

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 比较尼斯结弹性固定与螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的疗效。 方法 回顾分析比较2013年5月—2018年6月,收治40例下胫腓联合损伤患者,其中21例采用尼斯结弹性固定(A组),19例采用螺钉固定(B组)。比较分析两组患者的手术时间、并发症、骨折愈合时间、完全负重时间以及术后AOFAS评分。结果 所有患者均获随,A组随访时间20.48±4.88月,B组随22.95±5.12月。A组1例伤口浅表感染,发生率4.76%,B组1例患者伤口浅表感染,发生率为5.0%,两组比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。平均手术时间(复位和固定下胫腓联合)A组为13.62±2.44分钟,B组为16.53±2.34分钟,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨折愈合时间A组平均为13.05±3.14周,B组为14.11±2.94周,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组平均完全负重时间为10.05±1.94周,B组为11.37±2.00周,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后最后一次随访平均AOFAS评分A组为89.86±13.23,B组为80.37±15.16,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 尼斯结弹性固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤稳定可靠,弹性固定保留了下胫腓联合韧带的生理微动功能,有利于早期功能锻炼及踝关节功能恢复,减少并发症发生,是一种治疗下胫腓联合损伤的有效方法。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the clinical results of nice knot fixation versus screw fixation for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. [Methods] A retrospective study was conducted on 40 patients who received surgical treatment for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury from May 2013 to June 2018. Of them, 21 patients had distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury fixed by nice knot using polyester suture (Ethicon, USA), while the remaining 19 patients fixed by srews (Weigao, Shandong,China). The operation time, complications, healing time, full weight loading time and AOFAS score were compared between the two groups. [Results] All patients were followed up, the follow-up time of group A was 20.48 ± 4.88 months, and that of group B was 22.95 ± 5.12 months. One patient in group A had superficial wound infection, and one patients in group B had superficial wound infection. The average operation time (reduction and fixation of the lower tibiofibular syndesmosis) was 13.62 ±2.44 minutes in group A and 16.53 ±2.34 minutes in group B. There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The average time of fracture healing was 13.05 ± 3.14 weeks in group A and 14.11 ± 2.94 weeks in group B, there was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The average time of complete weight-bearing in group A was 10.05±1.94 weeks, and in group B it was 11.37 ± 2.00 weeks. There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the average AOFAS score in group A was 89.86 ±+13.23, while that in group B was 80.37±15.16. There was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). [Conclusion] Nice knot for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury is stable and reliable. It is a kind of elastic fixation, and retains the physiologic micromotion function at the syndesmosis. It is conducive to early functional exercise and recovery of ankle joint function, and reduces complications. It is an effective method for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01
  • 最后修改日期:2019-09-11
  • 录用日期:2019-11-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: