上颈椎前路钩状钛板内固定系统的三维有限元分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南华大学附属第一医院脊柱外科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

湖南省衡阳市科技局课题,湖南省卫计委重大专项


Finite element analysis of anterior upper cervical hook-plate internal fixation system
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Spine Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nan-hua University

Fund Project:

Science and Technology Bureau Topics of Hengyang City, Hunan Province; Major Special Projects of Hunan Provincial Health Planning Commission

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 运用有限元方法评价钩板内固定和椎弓根螺钉内固定生物力学稳定性,并了解应力分布情况。 [方法] 运用有限元软件建立枢椎椎体缺失模型,并将钩板内固定和椎弓根钉棒内固定加载到缺损模型上,进行计算和分析,得到各个有限元模型的活动度(ROM)和应力分布云图。 [结果] 缺损模型和正常模型比较,在前屈工况下存在明显不稳。两种内固定模型的稳定性均明显强于正常模型及缺损模型。钩板模型在侧屈工况下稳定性略强于钉棒模型, 而在其他工况下,其稳定性要略差于钉棒模型。钩板内固定在前屈下最大应力值略小于钉棒内固定,而在其他工况下,均明显大于钉棒内固定,应力主要集中在钩板连接处。钉棒内固定应力分布较为平均,最大应力区域主要位于C1侧块螺钉尾部。 [结论] 钩板模型的稳定性明显强于正常模型和缺损模型,但略差于钉棒模型,可以达到临床稳定性要求。钩板连接部存在应力过高,此处易产生断裂。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To evaluate biomechanical stability and security of upper cervical hook-plate fixation and pedicle screw fixation by finite element method. The stress distribution of these fixations were also investigated. [Methods] Finite element software was used to establish the axis defect model and then the hook-plate fixation and pedicle screw fixation were loaded on the deletion model for calculation and analysis to obtain the ROM of each model and the stress cloud of the internal fixation model. [Result] Compared with the normal model, the defect model was unstable only under the condition of flexion. The stability of the two internal fixation models was significantly stronger than that of the normal model and the defect model. The stability of hook-plate model was slightly stronger than that of pedicle screw model only under lateral buckling condition, while it was worse under other conditions. In terms of stress, the maximum stress of hook-plate fixation was slightly less than that of pedicle screw fixation under forward bending condition, but it was obviously greater under other conditions. The stress of hook-plate fixation mainly concentrated on the position of hook-plate connection, while the stress of pedicle screw fixation is relatively average and the maximum stress area was mainly located at the tail of C1 screw. [Conclusion] The hook-plate fixation is obviously more stable than normal upper cervical spine and axis defect spine, but slightly worse than pedicle screw fixation, which can meet the requirements of clinical stability. Local stress is high in the connecting part of hook-plate, which is prone to fracture.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-30
  • 最后修改日期:2019-09-19
  • 录用日期:2019-10-08
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: