腰椎滑脱症的侧路微创融合手术治疗
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.广州中医药大学研究生院;2.中国人民解放军南部战区总医院;3.中国人民解放军南部战区总医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R687.3

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Radiologic and clinical outcomes of extreme lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;2.General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command;3.General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨极外侧腰椎椎间融合术(XLIF)微创治疗Meyerding Ⅰ°和Ⅱ°腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。 方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月,应用XILF手术治疗Meyerding Ⅰ°和Ⅱ°腰椎滑脱症患者54例。其中XLIF辅助侧方椎体螺钉固定(LF)30例,XLIF辅助双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(BPS)24例。比较两组患者的手术时间、出血量,手术疗效,手术并发症,VAS评分和JOA评分,术前及术后影像学参数,融合器下沉、融合率等。 结果:两组患者术后影像学参数均得到显著改善,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。两组患者塌陷率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。LF组手术时间及出血量均小于BPS组(P﹤0.05)。两组术后VAS评分及JOA评分均有显著改善,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义(P﹤0.05); LF组至少1年以上随访的融合率为80%,BPS组为83.33%。 结论:XLIF手术是治疗轻度腰椎滑脱症安全有效的微创术式。侧方椎体螺钉固定及双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的影像学及临床疗效相似。

    Abstract:

    [OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the efficacy of the extreme lateral transpsoas approach to the low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.[METHODS] A retrospective study, from 2012 to 2017, 54 patients of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis, underwent minimally invasive XLIF procedure using 2 different fixation(lateral fixation in 30 patients and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in 24 patients). The following data were compared between the 2 groups:surgical time,blood loss,cage subsidence, fusion rate. Radiologic parameters (slipping percentage, foraminal height, disc height, lumbar lordotic angle, and anterior-posterior diameter of the canal) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores.[RESULTS] The disc height, foraminal height, rate of spondylolisthesis reduction, lumbar lordotic angle and anterior-posterior diameter of the canal were significantly increased from preoperatively to each time follow-up in lateral fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation groups (P﹤0.05). Although the surgical time and blood loss in the lateral fixation group were significantly less than the bilateral pedicle screw fixation group (P﹤0.05). But the mean correction of vertebral slippage measured on lateral lumbar X-ray was 42.30% in the lateral fixation group and 58.42% in the bilateral pedicle screw fixation group (P﹤0.05). At the last follow-up, cage subsidence was similar between the 2 groups(P﹥0.05).The fusion rate was 80% in lateral fixation group and 83.33% in bilateral pedicle screw fixation group. At preoperative and last follow-up postoperative, VAS and JOA scores of the 2 groups did not show significant differences (P﹥0.05). From preoperative to last follow-up postoperative, the VAS and JOA scores were significantly improved in all groups (P﹤0.05). [CONCLUSIONS] XLIF is a reliable minimally invasive technique to treat low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. No significant differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes were found among the lateral fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in extreme lateral transpsoas approach.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-24
  • 最后修改日期:2019-08-25
  • 录用日期:2019-11-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: