改良Wiltse入路置钉与经皮置钉治疗Dennis(I、II型)胸腰椎骨折的疗效对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

武威市人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of modified Wiltse approach and percutaneous screw placement in the treatment of Dennis (type I, II) thoracolumbar fracture
Author:
Affiliation:

wuwei people s hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【背景】:随着脊柱外科领域中微创技术的提高和ERAS理念的普及,经肌间隙入路置钉和通道辅助下经皮置钉两种术式无疑在治疗无神经、脊髓症状的胸腰椎骨折方面具有独特优势,然而两种微创术式相比各有何特点及技术要点却鲜见报道。【目的】:通过对比通道辅助经皮置钉与改良后Wiltse入路置钉两种微创术式短节段椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床疗效,分析两种术式的优缺点和技术要点。【方法】:选择2014年1月--2018年1月在我院收治的符合纳入标准的76例无神经、脊髓损伤的胸腰椎骨折Dennis(I、II型)手术治疗的患者。根据其采用的术式不同分为两组进行回顾性分析。其中经皮置钉A组(n=40例)肌间隙入路B组(n=36例),对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量,术后1周的VAS评分、CK-MB水平、以及术后Cobb角及伤椎高度比的变化、Oswestry功能障碍评分等相关指标进行统计学分析。【结果】:两组患者均全部获得随访,A组患者术中出血量、住院天数、术后早期VAS评分及术后1天、3天的CK-MB水平均明显优于B组,但手术时间B组要比A组短,同时术后的Cobb角恢复、Oswestry功能评分两组并无明显差别。【结论】两种术式都能很好的对胸腰椎骨折进行复位、固定,能够在保证患者满意度的前提下加速术后康复。经皮置钉组在术中出血量、术后机能恢复、住院天数和疼痛缓解,尤其是小切口美观方面具有明显优势;但肌间隙入路置钉组由于其手术时间短、可操作性更强、容易掌握可以在基层医院进行推广。

    Abstract:

    [Background] With the improvement of minimally invasive techniques in spinal surgery and the popularization of ERAS concept, there is no doubt that the two kinds of minimally invasive techniques have unique advantages in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological and spinal cord symptoms. However, there are few reports on the characteristics and technical points of the two minimally invasive techniques. [Objective] To compare the clinical efficacy of two minimally invasive approaches, channel-assisted percutaneous screw placement and modified Wiltse screw placement, in the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures, and to analyze the advantages, disadvantages and technical points of the two approaches. [Method] 76 cases of thoracolumbar fracture Dennis (type I, II) without nerve and spinal cord injury were selected from January 2014 to January 2018. They were divided into two groups according to their different surgical methods for retrospective analysis. In group A (n = 40 cases) and group B (n = 36 cases), the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, VAS score, CK-MB level, Cobber angle and vertebral height ratio, Oswestry dysfunction score and other related indicators of the two groups were analyzed statistically. [Result] Both groups were followed up. The intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization days, early VAS score and CK-MB level of group A were significantly better than those of group B, but the operation time of group B was shorter than that of group A. There was no significant difference in the recovery of obber angle and Oswestry function score between the two groups. [Conclusion] Both methods can reduce and fix thoracolumbar fracture well, and can accelerate the recovery after operation on the premise of guaranteeing patients'satisfaction. Percutaneous nailing group has obvious advantages in intraoperative bleeding volume, functional recovery after operation, hospitalization days and pain relief, especially in the aesthetic aspects of small incision. However, the intermuscular approach nailing group can be popularized in grass-roots hospitals because of its short operation time, stronger operability and easy grasp。

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-22
  • 最后修改日期:2019-07-23
  • 录用日期:2019-08-02
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: