OLIF技术联合后路Wiltes入路内固定治疗单节段腰椎结核的临床疗效观察
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

宁夏医科大学总医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical Observation on Treating Single-segmental Lumbar Tuberculosis via OLIF Technique Combined Posterior Wiltes Approach Internal fixation
Author:
Affiliation:

General hospital of ningxia medical university

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]观察OLIF技术联合后路Wiltes入路内固定治疗单节段腰椎结核中的临床效果。[方法]2015年3月至2018年3月我院手术治疗40例单节段腰椎结核患者,根据手术方法不同将其分为OLIF技术联合后路Wiltes入路内固定手术组(微创组)和传统前路病灶清除联合后路内固定手术组(传统组)。围手术期分别记录两组患者的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院天数。随访时评估两组患者腰部疼痛、神经功能恢复、植骨融合及病灶治愈情况。[结果]两组在手术时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而微创组在腹部切口长度、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间均小于传统组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后腰痛VAS评分均低于术前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);微创组在术后各时间段的腰痛VAS评分均低于传统组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后6个月及末次随访的ESR和CRP均较术前明显下降差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后Cobb角矫正度数及丢失度数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组植骨融合率及病灶治愈率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]OLIF技术联合后路Wiltes入路内固定术治疗单节段腰椎结核与传统前后路手术相比,病灶治愈效果相当,但其创伤小,术后并发症少,患者康复快。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]Investigate the clinical efficacy of treating single-segmental lumbar tuberculosis via OLIF technique combined posterior wiltes approach internal fixation.[Methods] From March 2015 to March 2018, according to different surgical methods, 40 patients with single-segmental lumbar tuberculosis undergoing operation in our hospital were divided into OLIF technique combined with posterior Wiltes approach internal fixation group (Minimally invasive group) and traditional anterior approach combined with posterior internal fixation group (The traditional group). During perioperative period, the operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and hospitalization days of the patients in the two groups were recorded. During follow-up, patients were assessed for lumbar pain, nerve function recovery, bone graft fusion and focal healing.[Results]There was no statistically significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P>0.05), while the length of abdominal incision, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and length of hospitalization in Minimally invasive group were all lower than those in The traditional group (P<0.05). VAS scores of postoperative low back pain in the two groups were lower than those before surgery,showing statistically significant differences (P<0.05). VAS scores of lower back pain in minimally invasive group were lower than those in the traditional group at each postoperative period, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). ESR and CRP of the two groups were significantly decreased 6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up compared with that before surgery, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05), and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in correction degree and loss degree of Cobb’s Angle between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of bone graft fusion and the cure rate of lesions between the two groups (P>0.05).[Conclusion]Compared with the opaertion of traditional anterior and posterior approaches, OLIF technique combined with posterior Wiltes approach in the treatment of single-segmental lumbar tuberculosis has a similar curative effect, but it has less trauma, fewer postoperative complications and faster recovery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29
  • 最后修改日期:2019-08-22
  • 录用日期:2019-08-23
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: