一期前后路与后路手术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化伴发育性椎管狭窄的对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京中医药大学;2.中日友好医院骨科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A comparative study of one-stage anterior-posterior approach and single-stage posterior approach for the treatment of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with developmental spinal stenosis
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Beijing University of Chinese Medicine;2.China-Japan Friendship Hospital;3.Department of Orthopaedics , China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:[目的]比较一期前后路与单纯后路治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化伴发育性椎管狭窄的临床疗效差异。[方法]回顾性分析我院2013年4月至2016年7月我院收治颈椎后纵韧带骨化伴发育性椎管狭窄患者共31例,其中AP组采用一期后路单开门椎管扩大成型术联合前路椎体次全切植骨内固定术治疗,共16例, P组采用后路组单开门椎管扩大成型术治疗,共15例。采用日本矫形外科学会(JOA)颈椎评估患者神经功能改善情况。两组患者术前术后均行X线、CT、MRI检查,测量两组患者术前术后Pavlov比值、脊髓缓冲空间、K-line(+)%评价手术减压影像学效果。[结果]31例患者均获随访,所有患者均未出现内固定松动、融合失败、植入物断裂等情况。两组患者术前JOA评分、Pavlov比值、脊髓缓冲空间、K-line(+)%,术后Pavlov比值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后及末次随访JOA评分、术后及末次随访平均JOA改善率AP组患者高于P组患者,两组之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),末次随访K-line(+)%、脊髓缓冲空间AP组患者显著高于P组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后并发症两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]采用一期前后路手术较单纯后路手术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化伴发育性椎管狭能够获得更大减压效果,提高临床疗效,是一种安全、合理、有效的治疗方案。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: [Objective] To compare the efficacy of one-stage anterior and single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with developmental cervical stenosis. [Methods] A retrospective analysis of 31 patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine with vertebral stenosis in our hospital from April 2013 to July 2016, 16 patients underwent one-stage anterior-posterior surgery as AP group,15 patients were treated by single-stage posterior surgery as P group. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the clinical consequences. X-ray, CT and MRI were performed preoperative and postoperative. Pavlov ratio, spinal cord reserving space, and K-line(+)% were used to evaluate the effect of surgical decompression. The preoperative and postoperative JOA scores, the improvement rate of JOA scores, and the complications of the two groups were recorded. [Results] All 31 patients were followed up. All patients had no internal fixation loosening, fusion failure, and implant fracture. There were no significant differences in preoperative JOA score, Pavlov ratio, spinal cord reserving space, K-line (+)%, and postoperative Pavlov ratio between the two groups (P>0.05). JOA score, postoperative and last postoperative and postoperative follow-up JOA improvement rate in the AP group was higher than that in the P group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The K-line(+)% at the last follow-up and the AP group in the spinal cord buffer space were significantly higher than those in the P group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05).[Conclusion] One-stage anterior-posterior surgery is more safe, reasonable and effective than single-stage posterior approach for the treatment of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification with developmental spinal canal to obtain greater decompression and improve clinical efficacy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29
  • 最后修改日期:2019-07-23
  • 录用日期:2019-08-02
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: