锁骨远端锁定钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折的疗效对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

桂林医学院第二附属医院(临桂区人民医院)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R816.8

基金项目:

广西卫生厅自筹经费课题(Z2013470)


Comparison of effect on treatment of Neer Ⅱ distal clavicular fracture between distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook plate
Author:
Affiliation:

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]对比锁骨远端锁定钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗 Neer Ⅱ型锁骨远端骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾2014年9月至2017年8月在我科接受手术治疗的Neer Ⅱ型锁骨远端骨折患者共46例,根据手术方式不同分为两组,锁定钢板组22例,锁骨钩钢板组24例。比较两组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、骨折愈合情况、术后疼痛、术后并发症及术后肩关节功能方面的差异。疼痛评估采用视觉模拟评分(VAS),肩关节功能评价使用 Constant-Murley 评分和UCLA评分。[结果]锁定钢板组与锁骨钩钢板组在手术时间、术中出血量方面无统计学差异,锁定钢板组手术切口长度短于锁骨钩钢板组(p<0.05);两组患者骨折均完全愈合且愈合时间无显著差异;术后 3月的 VAS 评分、Constant-Murley 评分和UCLA评分对比中,锁定钢板组明显优于锁骨钩钢板组(p<0.05),但术后6个月时两组间无显著差异;锁定钢板组术后并发症(2例)明显低于锁骨钩钢板组(9例)(p<0.05)。[结论]与锁骨钩钢板相比,使用锁骨远端锁定钢板治疗 NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折切口更小,可明显减少术后短期疼痛及术后并发症。因此,治疗NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折可以优先考虑使用锁定钢板。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To compare the clinical effect of distal clavicular locking plates with that of clavicular hook plates in the treatment of Neer Ⅱ distal clavicular fractures. [Methods]From September 2014 to August 2017, a total of 46 patients with Neer Ⅱ distal clavicular fractures have undergone surgical treatment in our Department. Said 46 cases were divided into two groups, one group containing 22 cases treated with locking plates, while the other group containing 24 cases treated with clavicular hook plates. Then the two groups were compared in respect of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, fracture healing, postoperative pain, postoperative complications and postoperative shoulder joint function, respectively. Pain was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and shoulder joint function was evaluated using Constant-Murley score and UCLA score. [Results]There was no statistical difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups, the length of incision in the locking plate group was significantly shorter than that in the hook plate group (p < 0.05). Fractures in both groups were healed completely, and there was no significant difference in healing time. Three months after operation, the VAS score, the Constant-Murley score and the UCLA score in the locking plate group were, respectively, significantly better than those in the hook plate group (p < 0.05), which scores, however, showed no significant difference between the two groups six months after operation. Postoperative complications of the locking plate group (2 cases) were significantly lower than those of the hook plate group (9 cases) (p<0.05). [Conclusion]The treatment of Neer Ⅱ distal clavicular fractures with distal clavicular locking plates resulted in shorter length of incision as compared with clavicular hook plates, which could obviously reduce postoperative short-term pain and postoperative complications. Therefore, locking plates may be considered preferentially in the treatment of Neer Ⅱ distal clavicular fractures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-28
  • 录用日期:2019-07-30
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: