有限切开复位弹性钉结合尾帽固定治疗儿童 不稳定型股骨干骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院;2.广西贵港市骨科医院;3.广西医科大学第一附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

2019年度广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目


Limited open reduction and titanium elastic nail combined with end caps fixation to treat unstable femoral shaft fractures of children
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Guangxi Medical University;2.Orthopaedics Hospital of Guigang, Guangxi;3.The first affiliated hospital, Guangxi Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较有限切开复位与闭合复位弹性钉结合尾帽治疗儿童不稳定型股骨干骨折的临床疗效及影像学结果。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年1月至2016年6月收治的54例年龄5~13岁的股骨干不稳定型骨折患儿资料,其中24例采用有限切开复位弹性钉结合尾帽固定(A组),30例采用闭合复位弹性钉结合尾帽固定(B组)。两组患儿术前一般资料具有可比性。比较分析两组患儿的术中指标及术后的放射结果、临床疗效及并发症情况。结果:与B组相比,A组手术时间及术中放射线暴露时间明显缩短,术中骨折例数更少,两组差异有统计学意义, P

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the clinical and radiological results in unstable pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated with either limited open reduction or closed reduction and titanium elastic nailing combined with end caps. Methods Retrospectively analyze the data of total 54 cases of 5-13 years children with unstable femoral shaft fractures, from January 2012 to June 2016, were treated with titanium elastic nail and end caps.24 cases were treated with limited open reduction and 30 cases were treated with closed reduction. The intraoperative indexes and postoperative radiological results, clinical outcomes and complications of the two groups were assessed.Results Both surgical and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in group B.The cases of intraoperative fracture were fewer in group A.There were no significant differences between intraoperative estimated blood loss, length of stay,fracture healing time, partial weight bearing time and complications.Applying Beaty imaging result to group A, satisfactory results were documented in 22 cases, unsatisfactory results in 2 cases.In group B, satisfactory were seen in 16 cases, unsatisfactory in 14 cases.According to the TEN outcome scoring system, group A was excellent in 15 cases, good in 9 cases.In group B, excellent were seen in 5 cases, good in 22 cases, poor in 3 cases.The results of early Beaty imaging were statistically different between the two groups.At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological results.Conclusions Limited open reduction is an superior method of limited open reduction to gain better reduction fixation and to decrease complications, the time of surgical and fluoroscopy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-27
  • 最后修改日期:2019-07-09
  • 录用日期:2019-07-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: