改良骨膜下及肌间隙入路在胸腰椎手术中的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

苏州大学附属第二医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparision research of modified posterior approach and paraspinal musclespace approach for thoracolumbar surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

The Second Affliated Hospital of Soochow University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较研究改良骨膜下入路和肌间隙入路在胸腰椎手术中的疗效。方法:2016年10月~2017年12月收治的69例需行手术治疗患者,包括胸腰椎骨折内固定23例、腰椎退行性疾病行经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)46例,术中同一患者棘突两侧采用不同手术入路进行比较,一侧为改良骨膜下入路,对侧为肌间隙入路,通过对比两种入路的暴露时间和出血量、椎弓根开口失误率以及术后引流量、腰背痛VAS评分、切口周围肿胀程度、末次随访时MRI检测两侧椎旁肌脂肪浸润程度及椎旁肌面积来评价两种手术入路的临床疗效。结果:所有患者手术顺利完成且均获得随访,随访时间为10~18个月。两种手术入路在暴露时间和出血量、椎弓根开口失误率、术后腰背部疼痛VAS评分、切口周围肿胀程度以及末次随访MRI显示两侧椎旁肌脂肪浸润程度及椎旁肌面积各项指标无统计学差异(P>0.05),改良骨膜下入路组仅术后引流量大于肌间隙入路组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:胸腰椎手术中,改良骨膜下入路与肌间隙入路相比均能取得良好的临床疗效,具有创伤小、对椎旁肌损伤少的优点,而改良骨膜下入路更具有暴露充分,便于完成减压,适用范围广,学习曲线短等优点。

    Abstract:

    Objective:Comparision in clinical effects of modified posterior approach and paraspinal musclespace approach for thoracolumbar surgery.Methods:69 patients(including 23 cases of thoracolumbar fracture treated with internal fixation patients and 46 cases of lumbar degenerative diseases treated with lumbar intervertebral fusion)who were admitted to our orthopedic department from October 2016 to December 2017.Two sides of the spines of the same patient were treated with different surgical approache during the operation.One side was modified posterior approach while the other side was subjected to the paraspinal musclespace approach,So a total of 138 cases of data.To evaluate the clinical effects of the two surgical approaches,the data of the two approaches were compared,including duration and the volume of blood loss of exposure,miss probability of pedicle puncture,post-operative drainage and VAS score of back pain,degree of soft tissue swelling around the incision,as well as the VAS score at the last follow-up,degree of adipose tissue deposition and the area of paravertebral muscles measured with MRI scan.Results:All patients were successfully operated and followed up for 10~18 months.For the two approaches,there was no significant difference in the exposure time,volume of blood loss during exposure,miss probability of pedicle puncture,VAS score of back pain,degree of soft tissue swelling around the incision,and the deposition of adipose tissue in the paravertebral muscles and the area of paravertebral muscles at the last follow-up(P>0.05).Only the volume of post-operative drainage in the modified posterior approach group was larger than that in the paraspinal musclespace approach group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the course of surgical treatment of thoracolumbar diseases,compared with paraspinal musclespace approach,the modified posterior approach can also achieve good surgical effects,both of them accord with the idea of minimally invasion,while the modified posterior approach have the advantages of wider indication,simple operation and shorter learning curve.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-25
  • 最后修改日期:2019-07-15
  • 录用日期:2019-07-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: