椎弓根皮质骨通道与椎弓根螺钉治疗骨质疏松性腰椎疾病
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.滨州市滨城区市立医院;2.滨州医学院附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

山东省自然科学基金资助项目


Treatment of osteoporotic lumbar disease with cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screw
Author:
Affiliation:

1.bincheng district municipal hospital;2.Binzhou medical university hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]:探究椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉固定术(CBT)与椎弓根螺钉内固定术(PS)在治疗腰椎退行性变合并骨质疏松症患者的临床疗效。[方法]:回顾滨州医学院附属医院自2016年5月—2018年5月行椎弓根螺钉内固定和椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉内固定共计87位患者,根据纳入及排除标准筛选出进入研究的患者共计65例,其中椎弓根螺钉内固定的患者35例,椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉内固定的患者30例。收集并记录患者术前术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会量表(JOA)、术中出血量、手术时间以及术后螺钉松动和融合情况。随访时间均大于9月,平均9.3月。数据采用SPSS.19进行统计学分析两种手术方式的临床疗效。[结果]:在缓解疼痛及改善患者功能障碍方面,两组患者术后得到了明显的的改善(p<0.05),两组间比较效果相似(p>0.05);在术中出血量、手术时间方面,椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉内固定组明显优于椎弓根螺钉内固定组(p<0.05),在融合及螺钉松动方面短期内效果相似(P>0.05)。[结论]:椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉内固定术与椎弓根螺钉内固定术在治疗腰椎退行性变合并骨质疏松症患者方面都取得了良好的疗效,椎弓根皮质骨通道螺钉固定术在术中出血量、手术时间方面优于椎弓根螺钉内固定术。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]: To investigate the clinical efficacy of cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screw in the treatment of lumbar degenerative and osteoporosis patients.[Methods]: A total of 87 patients underwent pedicle screw and cortical bone trajectory from May 2016 to May 2018 in Binzhou medical university hospital . A total of 65 patients were enrolled (35 patients with pedicle screw and 30 patients with cortical bone trajectory)according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data was collected and recorded including the preoperative and postoperative VAS, JOA, the amount of blood loss, the operation time, and the postoperative screw loosening and fusion. The follow-up time was more than 9 months, with an average of 9.3 months. The data was analyzed by SPSS.19 for statistical analysis of the clinical efficacy of the two surgical methods. [Results]: In the relief of pain and improvement of dysfunction in patients, the two groups of patients improved significantly after surgery(p<0.05), the effect was similar between the two groups (p>0.05); The amount of blood loss, operation time , the cortical bone trajectory group was significantly better than the pedicle screw group (p<0.05), but the effect was similar in short-term fusion and screw loosening(p>0.05). [Conclusion]: Cortical bone trajectory and pedicle screw have achieved good results in the treatment of lumbar degenerative and osteoporosis patients.Cortical bone trajectory is superior to pedicle screw in terms of blood loss, operation time.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-31
  • 最后修改日期:2019-06-17
  • 录用日期:2019-07-15
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: