微创钛缆复位治疗股骨近端FAbEx骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

北京石景山医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


PROXIMAL FEMUR FAbEx FRACTURES TREATED BY CABLE REDUCTION
Author:
Affiliation:

Beijing Shijingshan Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨应用钛缆复位技术,配合髓内钉治疗股骨近端长斜型骨折的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2016年5月-2017年12月我院收治的41例长斜形股骨近端骨折患者的临床资料。钛缆组予以“双缆引导”法微创置入钛缆、钛缆复位、髓内钉固定治疗。对照组予以传统的复位钳钳夹复位、髓内钉固定治疗。比较二组临床疗效。结果 二组术中复位次数比较有统计学差异(P<0.05);钛缆组髋内翻角度与对照组比较明显降低(P<0.05),愈合时间更短(P<0.05);二组手术时间、术中出血量及术后1年髋关节Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 钛缆复位骨折的疗效优于传统钳夹复位,可显著提高手术治疗效果,缩短患者骨折的愈合时间。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical effect of cable reduction combined with intramedullary nail in the treatment of long oblique proximal femoral fractures. Methods The clinical data of 41 patients with long oblique proximal femoral fractures from May 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Cable group was treated by minimally invasive implantation of titanium cable, cable reduction and intramedullary nail fixation. The control group was treated with traditional clamp reduction and intramedullary nail fixation. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results There were significant differences in reduction times between the two groups (P<0.05); hip varus angle of the cable group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), and fracture healing time was shorter (P<0.05); there were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and Harris score of hip joint in the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of cable reduction is better than that of traditional clamp reduction, which can significantly improve the treatment effect and shorten the healing time of fracture.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-24
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-08
  • 录用日期:2019-11-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: