Wiltse入路与经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗单节段无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

扬州大学临床医学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A comparison of the Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation and the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single level thoracolumbar fracture without neurological deficits
Author:
Affiliation:

Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要: [目的] 比较Wiltse入路与经皮入路椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗单节段无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折的临床效果。[方法] 回顾性分析本院自2015年4月到2017年10月收治的38例单节段无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折患者。根据椎弓根螺钉植入方式分为Wiltse入路组(18例)和经皮组(20例)。比较两组切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术中X线透视次数及住院时间,同时比较两组术后不同时间点疼痛VAS评分、ODI评分、伤椎椎体高度及后凸畸形角度。[结果] 38例患者均获得随访,时间12~15个月。经皮组与Wiltse入路组患者术后伤椎椎体前缘高度及后凸畸形Cobb角较术前都得到显著改善(P < 0.05),但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与Wiltse入路组比较,经皮组手术切口较小,术中出血较少,术后住院时间较短,术1周的VAS和ODI评分较低,但手术时间较长,术中X线透视次数较多,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术后3、12个月的VAS 评分及ODI 评分比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 [结论] Wiltse入路与经皮椎弓根钉内固定治疗单节段无神经损伤的胸腰椎骨折均可以获得满意的伤椎椎体前缘高度及后凸畸形角度恢复。虽然经皮椎弓根钉内固定增加了手术时间及术中透视次数,但可以显著减少手术创伤,减轻术后早期疼痛,缩短住院时间。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of Wiltse approach and percutaneous approach pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single level thoracolumbar fracture without neurological deficits. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 38 cases of single level thoracolumbar fracture without neurological deficits admitted to our hospital from April 2015 to October 2017. According to the approach of pedicle screw implantation, the patients were divided into Wiltse approach group (18 cases) and percutaneous group (20 cases). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative X-ray frequency and hospitalization time postoperative were compared between the two groups. The VAS score, ODI score, vertebral body height and kyphosis deformity of Cobb’s angle were also compared between the two groups at different postoperative time points. Results All 38 patients were followed up for 12 to 15 months. Both Wiltse approach group and percutaneous group showed significant improvement in the height and Cobb’s angle of the fracture vertebral body postoperative (P < 0.05), but the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The length of incision, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, VAS and ODI score at 1 week after surgery were less in percutaneous group compared with those of Wiltse approach group (P < 0.05). However, the intraoperative X-ray frequency、Intraoperative blood loss and operation time of percutaneous group were more than those of Wiltse approach (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both Wiltse approach and percutaneous approach pedicle screw internal fixation could achieve satisfactory recovery of height and Cobb’s angle of the fracture vertebral body in the treatment of single level thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits. Although percutaneous approach increased X-ray frequency and operation time, it can significantly shorten post-operative hospitalization time, reduce surgical trauma and early postoperative pain.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-20
  • 最后修改日期:2019-04-24
  • 录用日期:2019-05-20
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: