个体化伤椎单侧置钉联合打压植骨术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

江西省赣州市中医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江西省赣州市科学技术局指导性科技计划项目(编号:GZ2017ZSF298);赣州市卫生计生系统第二批优秀青年医学人才培养对象项目(编号:赣市卫计科教字[2018]16号)


Individualized unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the fractured vertebra combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Ganzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 观察胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者行个体化伤椎单侧置钉联合打压植骨术的临床疗效。 [方法] 对2016年4月至2018年2月胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者后路手术治疗患者60例进行回顾性分析,根据术中伤椎处理方式不同分为二组,30例行后路个体化伤椎单侧置钉联合打压植骨术(植骨组),30例行后路常规伤椎单侧置钉短节段内固定术(非植骨组)。比较两组临床资料。 [结果]所有患者术后随访12~33个月,平均(20.36?8.28)个月。两组椎体前缘压缩率、Cobb角术后均显著优于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1周比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而末次随访时植骨组显著优于非植骨组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后各时间点腰背痛VAS评分较术前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后相同时间点差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访植骨组有6例残留“空壳”,非植骨组有24例差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。植骨组无内固定松动、断裂等,非植骨组4例椎弓根钉根部断裂,3例连接棒断裂,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 [结论] 后路个体化伤椎单侧置钉联合打压植骨术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折可有效恢复并维持伤椎体高度及Cobb角,提高骨性愈合率,显著降低术后伤椎继发压缩及后凸畸形现象,较常规伤椎单侧置钉固定牢靠。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To observe the clinical outcomes of thoracolumbar burst fractures treated by individualized unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the fractured vertebra combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting. [Methods] A retrospective study was performed on 60 patients who received posterior short-segment instrumentation with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures from April 2016 to February 2018. In term of the different treatment of the fractured vertebra, they were divided into two groups, including the grafted group in which 30 patients had fracture fixed with individualized unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the fractured vertebra combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting, and the non -grafted group in which 30 patients received posterior short-segment instrumentation with routine unilateral pedicle screw fixation.The clinical data were compared between the two groups.. [Results] The operation time of the grafted group was longer than that of the non-grafted group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no statistically differences of blood loss and incision length between two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for 12 to 33 months with a mean of (20.36?8.28) months. The vertebral compression rate and Cobb angle after operation in both groups were significantly better than those before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05),There was no significant difference between the two groups at 1 week after operation (P>0.05),At the last follow-up, in the grafted group were significantly better than those in the non-grafted group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS scores in the two groups at each time point after operation was significantly improved compared with that before operation (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference at the same time point (P>0.05). There were 6 cases of “shell” phenomenon in the grafted group and 24 cases in the non-grafted group, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). No internal fixation loosening or breaking happened in any patient of the grafted group, while 4 cases of pedicle screw root breakage and 3 cases of connecting rod breakage in the non-grafted group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). [Conclusion] Individualized unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the fractured vertebra combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting does achieve stronger fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture than posterior short-segment instrumentation with routine unilateral pedicle screw fixation, which effectively restore and maintain the height and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebrae,increasing bone healing rate, significantly reduce the secondary compression and kyphosis of the fractured vertebrae after operation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-18
  • 最后修改日期:2019-04-07
  • 录用日期:2019-04-16
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: